What figure format do you prefer for doing peer review?

Springer Nature recently switched to a system where, as a reviewer, I seem to be getting all of the image files as separate documents. I’m wondering how many people like this option when reviewing papers versus finding it annoying.

In my opinion, manuscripts should be formatted to be easy to review. Then when they have at least made it to the revision stage, copy editors can request the authors re-format the manuscript.

This post was inspired by a post by Meghan Duffy, who asked where in a manuscript do you prefer figures? But that post assumed that they would be in the same file, to begin with.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s